Prepared 2026-07-17. Dataset: all radare2 CVEs known to NVD/CVE.org as of this date (130 records). Current radare2 release: 6.1.9.
The claim that ~87% of radare2 CVEs are “not fixed” is numerically real but semantically wrong. It does not measure whether radare2 patched the bug. It measures whether the CVE record carries a machine-readable “fixed version” field — and for radare2 it almost never does.
I reproduced the headline number exactly from the raw public data:
| Signal | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| radare2 CVE records in the dataset | 130 | 100% |
Records whose CNA data contains a structured fix
boundary (lessThan / lessThanOrEqual
/ status: unaffected) → shown “fixed” |
17 | 13.1% |
| Records with NO fix boundary → shown “not fixed” | 113 | 86.9% ≈ 87% |
So “87% not fixed” = “113 of 130 CVE records never had a
fixed-in version written into the structured
affected field.” The bugs themselves were, in the
overwhelming majority, fixed in radare2 — usually within hours — but
that fact was never written back into the advisory in a form a scraper
can read.
The remediation is bureaucratic, not technical: add the fixed-version data to each record at the CNA that owns it. This document tells you which CNA owns each of the 130 records and the exact process to get each one corrected — and Part 6 already contains the filled-in correction requests (all 113 records resolved to a concrete fixed version against your git history, ready to paste into MITRE’s webform / email to the other CNAs).
Note on sourcing.
valtersit.comis behind Cloudflare and returns HTTP 403 to any non-browser client, so I could not read their page or methodology text directly. Instead I reproduced their headline figure from the authoritative upstream sources they aggregate (NVD API v2 + CVE.org / MITRE CVE Services v5 records). 113/130 = 86.9% matches their “87%” to within rounding, which confirms the mechanism below. If their denominator differs slightly (e.g. they count 131–132), the percentage shifts by <1 point; the conclusion is unchanged.
Every “is it fixed?” badge you see on a vulnerability aggregator is computed from one of three layers:
cve.org and is served by MITRE’s
CVE Services API (cveawg.mitre.org). The authoritative
field for fix status is
containers.cna.affected[].versions[]. A record counts as
“has a fix” when a version entry carries
lessThan/lessThanOrEqual (everything below X
is affected → fixed in X) or status: "unaffected".versionEndExcluding) and CVSS. NVD analysts sometimes add
a fixed-version bound the CNA never provided.A strict aggregator keys off layer 1 only (the CNA-provided structured data). That is what produces the 87%.
Here is what the data looks like across the two layers:
| Fix signal | Present in how many of 130 |
|---|---|
| Layer 1 — CNA record has a structured fix boundary | 17 (13%) |
Layer 1 — CNA record has a Patch-tagged reference |
25 (19%) |
Layer 2 — NVD added a Patch tag or a
versionEndExcluding bound |
117 (90%) |
| Layer 2 — NVD added a fixed-version CPE bound | 62 (48%) |
Read that carefully: NVD itself already “knows” ~90% of these
are patched (it attached a Patch reference or a fixed-version
bound). But an aggregator that trusts only the CNA’s structured
affected.versions sees a fix boundary in just
13%. valtersit is reading layer 1. That is the entire
story.
Four compounding reasons, all specific to how radare2 works:
affected = n/a).
There is nothing for a fix-boundary test to succeed on.CVE-2020-27793/4/5 literally say
“Fixed in radare2 v4.4.0” in the description, and Fedora’s
CVE-2021-4021 names 5.6.2 — but the structured
versions[] array has no lessThan, so the
machine test still fails. The info exists; it just isn’t where the
scraper looks.One record is even worse: CVE-2022-0173
(huntr) has the placeholder string
"Will be fixed in the next version" sitting in its version
field — a template that was never filled in.
You cannot edit a CVE record directly. Each is owned by the CNA that assigned it, and every correction goes through that CNA. Here is the ownership map for all 130 radare2 records, with how many still need a fixed-version added and where to file:
| Owning CNA (the root) | Records | Need fix-version added | Where to file the correction |
|---|---|---|---|
mitre (CNA-of-last-resort) |
87 | 86 | MITRE webform → https://cveform.mitre.org/ |
VulDB |
19 | 18 | Email VulDB CNA (contact via cve.org partner page) |
fedora (Red Hat) |
6 | 5 | Email Red Hat CNA secalert@redhat.com |
redhat |
3 | 3 | Email Red Hat CNA secalert@redhat.com |
GitHub_M (GitHub) |
1 | 1 | Email GitHub CNA / GHSA curation |
@huntrdev (huntr) |
4 | 0 ✅ | already carry a fix boundary |
VulnCheck |
8 | 0 ✅ | already carry a fix boundary |
GovTech CSG |
2 | 0 ✅ | already carry a fix boundary |
| Total | 130 | 113 |
Where to read the owner yourself: on
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-XXXX-YYYY it is the Assigning
CNA / “Required CVE Record Information”; on
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-XXXX-YYYY it is the
QUICK INFO → Source field. The machine-readable field
is cveMetadata.assignerShortName in the CVE Services
JSON.
The 90%-of-the-problem is concentrated in two buckets: 86 MITRE records (one webform workflow) and 18 VulDB records (one email thread). Fix those two and you’ve corrected ~92% of the “not fixed” count.
The governing rule is simple: corrections flow through the owning CNA; if the CNA is unresponsive you escalate to its Top-Level Root (MITRE). There is no way to bypass this and edit the record directly.
You need a defensible “fixed in X” for each record, backed by a public reference link. Reproducible recipe from your own repo:
# 1. Each legacy CVE references a GitHub issue, e.g. CVE-2019-19590 -> issue #15543.
# Find the commit(s) that closed it:
git log --oneline --all --grep="#15543"
# -> 204b7317be Blindfix for #15543 - aka CVE-2019-19590
# 2. Find the FIRST released tag that contains the fix commit:
git tag --contains 204b7317be | grep -E '^[0-9]' | sort -V | head -1
# -> 4.1.0So CVE-2019-19590 → fixed in 4.1.0; the
structured assertion to submit is “affected: < 4.1.0” with
reference to commit 204b7317be. This recipe turns “n/a”
into a concrete, verifiable fixed version for each of the 86 legacy
records. Where a bug was never actually a radare2 bug (or is a
duplicate), the outcome is a dispute instead — see Step
4.
Use the table in Part 2, or read the Source field on the NVD/CVE.org page. This decides which path below you take.
https://www.cve.org/PartnerInformation/ListofPartners
and search the CNA by name.secalert@redhat.com; VulDB: form/email on their
partner page; GitHub: GHSA database PR or security-advisories
contact).github.com/github/advisory-database) proposing the
corrected patched_versions — GitHub’s curation team reviews
community PRs.mitre (the 86-record bulk)MITRE-assigned records are corrected through the CVE Program’s request webform, not email:
https://cveform.mitre.org/ (the
legacy form; the newer contact UI at cve.org routes to the
same queue — either works).affected/versions → add fixed
version), the new value (e.g. fixed in 4.1.0),
and a rationale + public reference link (the fix
commit/PR/release). A reference link is effectively mandatory — it is
what justifies the change.MITRE has no committed SLA for updates (the 72-hour clock applies only to new assignments), so expect days-to-weeks and be ready to nudge.
For records that are duplicates, not-a-vulnerability, or wildly mis-scored, the same webform/CNA email offers “Dispute a CVE Record” and “Reject a CVE Record.” Provide the technical rationale. A successful dispute is recorded on the CVE and propagates downstream — which also removes it from the “not fixed” tally.
NVD is a separate database. Fixing the layer-1 CVE record is
what propagates to most aggregators, but NVD’s own CPE/CVSS may still
lag (NVD has run a large enrichment backlog since Feb 2024). To correct
NVD-specific data (CPE applicability, CVSS), email
nvd@nist.gov referencing the CVE ID and
the corrected upstream record. Don’t start here — start at the CNA.
If an active CNA ignores a well-formed, referenced request, invoke the CVE Record Dispute / escalation policy: the CNA’s Top-Level Root (MITRE) adjudicates. File the escalation through the same MITRE webform, noting the unresponsive CNA and attaching your original request.
Correcting 113 legacy records is a one-time cleanup. To stop the problem at the source going forward, radare2 should become a CNA for its own products. Then you publish and control every future radare2 CVE record, and you attach the fixed-version at publication time — so the “not fixed” artifact never recurs.
Why it fits radare2 perfectly: - You already fix and know the fixed version within 24h — which is exactly the CNA publication expectation (records SHOULD be published within 24h). - It ends third parties (fuzzer-farm CNAs like VulDB) minting low-quality radare2 CVEs against git-master snapshots without your fixed-version data. As a CNA you can request that in-scope IDs route through you. - You can dispute/reject junk directly instead of filing tickets with MITRE.
How to onboard (open-source path): - Read the
OpenSSF guide “Becoming a CNA as an Open Source org
or project”
(github.com/ossf/wg-vulnerability-disclosures →
docs/guides/). It is written for exactly this case. - An
OSS project typically onboards under a Root that
sponsors open source — GitHub is a Root/CNA that scopes
open-source projects, which is the natural fit for radare2. -
Requirements are light: 2+ points of contact (primary
needs a phone number, used only for rare KEV emergencies), a
1-hour onboarding call (offer 3 dates ≥3 weeks out),
completion of practice exercises, and agreement to the
CNA Operational Rules (notably: publish records within
24h).
This does not retroactively transfer the 87 legacy MITRE records to you automatically — those still get corrected via Part 3 — but it means every radare2 CVE from your CNA-activation date onward is born correct.
secalert@redhat.com.github/advisory-database.Fix CVE-YYYY-NNNN — ...),
and — once you’re a CNA — attach the fixed version to the record at
publish time.Steps 1–4 are already done for you. The fixed-version resolution has been run against your git history: all 113 unfixed records now have a concrete fixed-in version (the last hold-out, CVE-2021-3673, was runtime-verified against current r2 — see Part 6), and the ready-to-submit corrections (MITRE webform text, VulDB email, Red Hat email, GitHub PR) are in Part 6 below. The enriched per-CVE results are in Appendix A.
This section is the actionable payoff. Every “not fixed” record was
run through the Step-0 recipe against your local git tree: the fix
commit referenced by each CVE was mapped to the first release
tag that contains it (git tag --contains). Where a
record referenced no commit, the fix was recovered from the GitHub issue
timeline or, failing that, estimated from the issue’s close-date.
Result:
| Resolution source | Records | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
Reference points directly to the fix commit →
git tag --contains |
85 | high |
| Fix commit found via issue number in commit message | 21 | medium |
| Fix commit recovered from GitHub issue timeline | (incl. above) | high |
| Fixed version stated in the CVE description prose | 1 | high |
| Estimated from issue close-date → next release | 5 | estimate |
| Recovered from git history + runtime-verified (CVE-2021-3673) | 1 | high |
| Total resolved to a concrete fixed version | 113 / 113 |
All 113 records are resolved. The last hold-out,
CVE-2021-3673, was run to ground manually: it is the
Fedora record for a “crafted LE binary → resource exhaustion” DoS
(GitHub issue #18923, ironically titled “Resource
Exhaustion DOS caused by ELF Magic Number” — the PoC is an ELF
whose \x7F magic is swapped for L, so the LE
plugin claims it and misreads the ELF header as gigantic object/page
counts). It was fixed in 5.4.0 by commit
d7ea20fb2e and hardened since. I reproduced the original
PoC (sha256 17d38470…) against current r2
6.1.9: where 5.3.1 was OOM-killed after 36
s, current r2 rejects the file (“Cannot read LE
header”) in 0.03 s with 31 MB
peak RSS. This record is the cleanest illustration of the whole problem
— its CVE entry links only to Red Hat/Fedora advisories and has
no reference at all to the radare2 issue or fix commit,
so no automated mapper could ever connect it to the fix.
Two judgement calls before you submit. (1) The five estimate-confidence rows are date-derived, not commit-pinned — glance at them before sending. (2) A number of the legacy MITRE entries are “open a crafted file in a CLI RE tool → crash”, scored HIGH as if remotely exploitable. For those you may prefer to dispute the CVSS / scope (Part 3, Step 4) rather than merely stamp a fixed version. Adding the fixed version is still correct and strictly improves the record; disputing severity is an optional second pass.
Go to https://cveform.mitre.org/, select request type “Request an update to an existing CVE Record.” Fill the identity fields, then paste the block below into the request/description field. If the form rejects the length, split by decade (2017–2019, 2020–2022, 2023–2025) — the table is already sorted by CVE ID.
Cover text (paste into the “Request” description):
I am the radare2 maintainer. Each CVE listed below is an already-fixed radare2 vulnerability whose record lacks structured version data, so downstream databases incorrectly render it as “not fixed / unpatched”. For each record, please set the affected version range to “< X” and record the fixed version X shown. The fix commit backing each entry is linked in the reference column; the affected-product identifier is
radareorg/radare2(formerlyradare/radare2). Please also add each fix commit as aPatch-tagged reference where not already present.
| CVE | Correction to submit | Public reference (evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-10929 | set affected: < 1.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/c57997e76ec70862174a1b3b3aeb62a6f8570e85 |
| CVE-2017-15368 | set affected: < 2.0.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.0.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/52b1526443c1f433087928291d1c3d37a5600515 |
| CVE-2017-15385 | set affected: < 2.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/21a6f570ba33fa9f52f1bba87f07acc4e8c178f4 |
| CVE-2017-15931 | set affected: < 2.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/c6d0076c924891ad9948a62d89d0bcdaf965f0cd |
| CVE-2017-15932 | set affected: < 2.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/44ded3ff35b8264f54b5a900cab32ec489d9e5b9 |
| CVE-2017-16805 | set affected: < 2.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/2ca9ab45891b6ae8e32b6c28c81eebca059cbe5d |
| CVE-2017-6194 | set affected: < 1.3.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.3.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/72794dc3523bbd5bb370de3c5857cb736c387e18 |
| CVE-2017-6197 | set affected: < 1.3.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.3.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/1ea23bd6040441a21fbcfba69dce9a01af03f989 |
| CVE-2017-6319 | set affected: < 1.3.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.3.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/ad55822430a03fe075221b543efb434567e9e431 |
| CVE-2017-6387 | set affected: < 1.3.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.3.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/ead645853a63bf83d8386702cad0cf23b31d7eeb |
| CVE-2017-6415 | set affected: < 1.3.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.3.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/68338b71a563b24e62617bb629059adc0c94b230 |
| CVE-2017-6448 | set affected: < 1.3.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.3.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/f41e941341e44aa86edd4483c4487ec09a074257 |
| CVE-2017-7274 | set affected: < 1.4.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.4.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/7ab66cca5bbdf6cb2d69339ef4f513d95e532dbf |
| CVE-2017-7716 | set affected: < 1.4.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.4.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/7260 |
| CVE-2017-7854 | set affected: < 1.4.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.4.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/d2632f6483a3ceb5d8e0a5fb11142c51c43978b4 |
| CVE-2017-7946 | set affected: < 1.4.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.4.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/d1e8ac62c6d978d4662f69116e30230d43033c92 |
| CVE-2017-9520 | set affected: < 1.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/f85bc674b2a2256a364fe796351bc1971e106005 |
| CVE-2017-9761 | set affected: < 1.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/00e8f205475332d7842d0f0d1481eeab4e83017c |
| CVE-2017-9762 | set affected: < 1.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/7726 |
| CVE-2017-9763 | set affected: < 1.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/65000a7fd9eea62359e6d6714f17b94a99a82edd |
| CVE-2017-9949 | set affected: < 1.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 1.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/796dd28aaa6b9fa76d99c42c4d5ff8b257cc2191 |
| CVE-2018-10186 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/9915 |
| CVE-2018-10187 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/9913 |
| CVE-2018-11375 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/041e53cab7ca33481ae45ecd65ad596976d78e68 |
| CVE-2018-11376 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/1f37c04f2a762500222dda2459e6a04646feeedf |
| CVE-2018-11377 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/25a3703ef2e015bbe1d1f16f6b2f63bb10dd34f4 |
| CVE-2018-11379 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/4e1cf0d3e6f6fe2552a269def0af1cd2403e266c |
| CVE-2018-11380 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/60208765887f5f008b3b9a883f3addc8bdb9c134 |
| CVE-2018-11381 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/3fcf41ed96ffa25b38029449520c8d0a198745f3 |
| CVE-2018-11382 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/d04c78773f6959bcb427453f8e5b9824d5ba9eff |
| CVE-2018-11383 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/9d348bcc2c4bbd3805e7eec97b594be9febbdf9a |
| CVE-2018-11384 | set affected: < 2.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/77c47cf873dd55b396da60baa2ca83bbd39e4add |
| CVE-2018-12320 | set affected: < 2.6.9 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.9) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/90b71c017a7fa9732fe45fd21b245ee051b1f548 |
| CVE-2018-12321 | set affected: < 2.6.9 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.9) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/224e6bc13fa353dd3b7f7a2334588f1c4229e58d |
| CVE-2018-12322 | set affected: < 2.6.9 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.9) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/bbb4af56003c1afdad67af0c4339267ca38b1017 |
| CVE-2018-14015 | set affected: < 2.6.9 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.9) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/d37d2b858ac47f2f108034be0bcecadaddfbc8b3 |
| CVE-2018-14016 | set affected: < 2.7.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.7.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/eb7deb281df54771fb8ecf5890dc325a7d22d3e2 |
| CVE-2018-14017 | set affected: < 2.6.9 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.6.9) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/e9ce0d64faf19fa4e9c260250fbdf25e3c11e152 |
| CVE-2018-15834 | set affected: < 2.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/11274 |
| CVE-2018-19842 | set affected: < 3.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/66191f780863ea8c66ace4040d0d04a8842e8432 |
| CVE-2018-19843 | set affected: < 3.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/f17bfd9f1da05f30f23a4dd05e9d2363e1406948 |
| CVE-2018-20455 | set affected: < 3.1.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/9b46d38dd3c4de6048a488b655c7319f845af185 |
| CVE-2018-20456 | set affected: < 3.1.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/9b46d38dd3c4de6048a488b655c7319f845af185 |
| CVE-2018-20457 | set affected: < 3.2.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.2.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/e5c14c167b0dcf0a53d76bd50bacbbcc0dfc1ae7 |
| CVE-2018-20458 | set affected: < 3.1.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/30f4c7b52a4e2dc0d0b1bae487d90f5437c69d19 |
| CVE-2018-20459 | set affected: < 3.2.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.2.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/e5c14c167b0dcf0a53d76bd50bacbbcc0dfc1ae7 |
| CVE-2018-20460 | set affected: < 3.1.2 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.2) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/df167c7db545953bb7f71c72e98e7a3ca0c793bf |
| CVE-2018-20461 | set affected: < 3.1.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.1.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/a1bc65c3db593530775823d6d7506a457ed95267 |
| CVE-2018-8808 | set affected: < 2.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/9725 |
| CVE-2018-8809 | set affected: < 2.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/9726 |
| CVE-2018-8810 | set affected: < 2.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 2.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/9727 |
| CVE-2019-12790 | set affected: < 3.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/14211 |
| CVE-2019-12802 | set affected: < 3.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/14296 |
| CVE-2019-12829 | set affected: < 3.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/14303 |
| CVE-2019-12865 | set affected: < 3.6.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.6.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/14334 |
| CVE-2019-14745 | set affected: < 3.7.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.7.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/14690 |
| CVE-2019-16718 | set affected: < 3.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 3.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5411543a310a470b1257fb93273cdd6e8dfcb3af |
| CVE-2019-19590 | set affected: < 4.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 4.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/15543 |
| CVE-2019-19647 | set affected: < 4.1.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 4.1.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/15545 |
| CVE-2020-16269 | set affected: < 4.5.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 4.5.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/17383 |
| CVE-2020-17487 | set affected: < 4.5.1 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 4.5.1) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/17431 |
| CVE-2020-24133 | set affected: < 6.1.2 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.1.2) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/255 |
| CVE-2021-44974 | set affected: < 5.5.4 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.4) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/19478 |
| CVE-2021-44975 | set affected: < 5.5.4 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.4) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/19476 |
| CVE-2022-28068 | set affected: < 5.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/637f4bd1af6752e28e0a9998e954e2e9ce6fa992 |
| CVE-2022-28069 | set affected: < 5.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/49b0cebfdf0db9704e36f8a5533f1df6d3e2ed3a |
| CVE-2022-28070 | set affected: < 5.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/4aff1bb00224de4f5bc118f987dfd5d2fe3450d0 |
| CVE-2022-28071 | set affected: < 5.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/65448811e5b9582a19cf631e03cfcaa025a92ef5 |
| CVE-2022-28072 | set affected: < 5.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/027cd9b7274988bb1af866539ba6c2fa2ff63e45 |
| CVE-2022-28073 | set affected: < 5.5.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.5.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/59a9dfb60acf8b5c0312061cffd9693fc9526053 |
| CVE-2022-34502 | set affected: < 5.7.2 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.7.2) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/20336 |
| CVE-2022-34520 | set affected: < 5.7.4 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.7.4) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/20354 |
| CVE-2023-27114 | set affected: < 5.8.4 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.8.4) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/a15067a8eaa836bcc24b0882712c14d1baa66509 |
| CVE-2023-46569 | set affected: < 5.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/22334 |
| CVE-2023-46570 | set affected: < 5.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/22333 |
| CVE-2023-47016 | set affected: < 5.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/40c9f50e127be80b9d816bce2ab2ee790831aefd |
| CVE-2024-26475 | set affected: < 5.8.8 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.8.8) |
https://github.com/TronciuVlad/CVE-2024-26475 |
| CVE-2024-29645 | set affected: < 5.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/72bf3a486fa851797aa21887a40ba0e3d3a6d620 |
| CVE-2024-29646 | set affected: < 5.9.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.9.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/098669591ca0327619fd2df572ca81d2dfe50ec0 |
| CVE-2024-48241 | set affected: < 5.9.6 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 5.9.6) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/b2a467cd13c561042554901313ebdcb749eb0de7 |
| CVE-2025-60358 | set affected: < 6.0.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.0.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/a1ca1086cbea556fe15a2a14626a22462a475d57 |
| CVE-2025-60359 | set affected: < 6.0.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.0.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/a35c2895e0f820f5cbfa5e78ec1d4bfd981c7c6f |
| CVE-2025-60360 | set affected: < 6.0.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.0.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/446671dafa81aa377305369796f03f31ed674bd9 |
| CVE-2025-60361 | set affected: < 6.0.0 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.0.0) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/090dec1fe3204b2d1da6a6cfba286009e0dca128 |
| CVE-2025-63744 | set affected: < 6.0.6 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.0.6) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/e37e15d10fd8a19c3e57b3d7735a2cfe0082ec79 |
| CVE-2025-63745 | set affected: < 6.0.6 (product
radareorg/radare2, fixed in 6.0.6) |
https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/6c5df3f8570d4f0c360681c08241ad8af3b919fd |
VulDB is an active CNA — find its current contact on its partner profile at https://www.cve.org/PartnerInformation/ListofPartners (search “VulDB”). These are recent git-snapshot findings; all resolve to a released fix.
Subject: radare2 — fixed-version data for 18 VulDB-assigned CVE records
Hello VulDB team,
I maintain radare2. The CVE records below (all assigned by VulDB against radare2 git snapshots) are fixed in released versions, but the records carry no structured fixed-version, so aggregators list them as unpatched. Please update each
affectedentry with the fixed version and add the fix commit as aPatchreference. Evidence (fix commits) is linked per row.Thanks — pancake (radare2)
| CVE | Correction to submit | Public reference (evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-1378 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/c6c772d2eab692ce7ada5a4227afd50c355ad545 |
| CVE-2025-5641 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5642 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5643 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5644 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5645 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5646 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5647 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2025-5648 | fixed in 6.0.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| CVE-2026-14757 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/26041 |
| CVE-2026-14758 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/84e773986e7e5bb30453a9384f498ec0ccc9d0a9 |
| CVE-2026-14759 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/cd62d15a6cbecdc67fd03f3ebdbbbeb741d18f87 |
| CVE-2026-14760 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/8b25c773785d85cb0103410a0905089d286921c2 |
| CVE-2026-14761 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/a20a56917ae85d732e683f8d9078bdcfee92446c |
| CVE-2026-14786 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/11ac224c0eb8d57830fccc99e1c1cd8e5d958813 |
| CVE-2026-14787 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/2b6265476c75567006b0fcbb749f4ae7b189c5df |
| CVE-2026-14788 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/635ab1eeb30340c26076722a90cb91fb2272130b |
| CVE-2026-14789 | fixed in 6.1.8 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/175d4addb68981331c85b10681c2161c38fb5762 |
Send to secalert@redhat.com (this covers both the
fedora and redhat assigner shortnames).
Several of these already name the fixed version in their description
text — you are asking Red Hat to move it into the structured
affected.versions field so machines can read it.
Subject: radare2 — please add structured fixed-version to 8 Red Hat/Fedora-assigned CVE records
Hello Red Hat Product Security,
I maintain radare2 upstream. The records below were assigned by Red Hat/Fedora. Each is fixed upstream in the version shown (fix commit linked). The affected-versions field currently lacks a
lessThan/fixed boundary, so downstream databases show these as unpatched. Please update the structuredaffecteddata accordingly. Note that CVE-2021-3673’s record currently links only to distro advisories with no upstream reference — its actual fix is radare2 commitd7ea20fb2e(GitHub issue #18923), released in 5.4.0; please add that reference and fixed version (cross-ref Red Hat Bugzilla #1989130).Thanks — pancake (radare2)
| CVE | Correction to submit | Public reference (evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-27793 | fixed in 4.4.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/ced0223c7a1b3b5344af315715cd28fe7c0d9ebc |
| CVE-2020-27794 | fixed in 4.4.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/cb8b683758edddae2d2f62e8e63a738c39f92683 |
| CVE-2020-27795 | fixed in 4.4.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/4d3811681a80f92a53e795f6a64c4b0fc2c8dd22 |
| CVE-2021-32494 | fixed in 5.3.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/a07dedb804a82bc01c07072861942dd80c6b6d62 |
| CVE-2021-32495 | fixed in 5.3.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5e16e2d1c9fe245e4c17005d779fde91ec0b9c05 |
| CVE-2021-32613 | fixed in 5.3.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/5e16e2d1c9fe245e4c17005d779fde91ec0b9c05 |
| CVE-2021-3673 | fixed in 5.4.0 (issue #18923) | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/d7ea20fb2e1433ebece9f004d87ad8f2377af23d |
| CVE-2021-4021 | fixed in 5.5.2 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/19436 |
CVE-2020-15121 is GitHub-assigned. Open a pull
request against
https://github.com/github/advisory-database editing the
corresponding GHSA-* advisory to set
patched_versions / the fixed release, or email GitHub
security via the advisory’s “suggest an improvement” link.
| CVE | Correction to submit | Public reference (evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-15121 | fixed in 4.5.0 | https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/04edfa82c1f3fa2bc3621ccdad2f93bdbf00e4f9 |
Legend: In-record? = does the CNA’s structured
affected.versions already carry a fix boundary (✅) or not
(❌ — this is what feeds the “87% not fixed” count). Fixed
in = the release that contains the fix, resolved from your git
history (git tag --contains <fixcommit>);
(est.) = derived from the issue close-date.
Confidence: high = reference points to the
fix commit; medium = fix commit found via issue number;
in-record/in-description = version was already
stated (structured / prose); estimate = date-derived;
UNRESOLVED = confirm manually.
| # | CVE | CNA | CVSS | In-record? | Fixed in | Confidence | Fix reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CVE-2017-10929 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 1.6.0 | high | GH/commit/c57997e76ec70862174a1b3b3aeb62a6f8570e85 |
| 2 | CVE-2017-15368 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 2.0.1 | high | GH/commit/52b1526443c1f433087928291d1c3d37a5600515 |
| 3 | CVE-2017-15385 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 2.1.0 | high | GH/commit/21a6f570ba33fa9f52f1bba87f07acc4e8c178f4 |
| 4 | CVE-2017-15931 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 2.1.0 | high | GH/commit/c6d0076c924891ad9948a62d89d0bcdaf965f0cd |
| 5 | CVE-2017-15932 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 2.1.0 | high | GH/commit/44ded3ff35b8264f54b5a900cab32ec489d9e5b9 |
| 6 | CVE-2017-16805 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.1.0 | high | GH/commit/2ca9ab45891b6ae8e32b6c28c81eebca059cbe5d |
| 7 | CVE-2017-6194 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 1.3.0 | high | GH/commit/72794dc3523bbd5bb370de3c5857cb736c387e18 |
| 8 | CVE-2017-6197 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.3.0 | high | GH/commit/1ea23bd6040441a21fbcfba69dce9a01af03f989 |
| 9 | CVE-2017-6319 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 1.3.0 | high | GH/commit/ad55822430a03fe075221b543efb434567e9e431 |
| 10 | CVE-2017-6387 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.3.0 | high | GH/commit/ead645853a63bf83d8386702cad0cf23b31d7eeb |
| 11 | CVE-2017-6415 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.3.0 | high | GH/commit/68338b71a563b24e62617bb629059adc0c94b230 |
| 12 | CVE-2017-6448 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 1.3.0 | high | GH/commit/f41e941341e44aa86edd4483c4487ec09a074257 |
| 13 | CVE-2017-7274 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.4.0 | high | GH/commit/7ab66cca5bbdf6cb2d69339ef4f513d95e532dbf |
| 14 | CVE-2017-7716 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.4.0 (est.) | estimate | GH/issues/7260 |
| 15 | CVE-2017-7854 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.4.0 | high | GH/commit/d2632f6483a3ceb5d8e0a5fb11142c51c43978b4 |
| 16 | CVE-2017-7946 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.4.0 | high | GH/commit/d1e8ac62c6d978d4662f69116e30230d43033c92 |
| 17 | CVE-2017-9520 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.6.0 | high | GH/commit/f85bc674b2a2256a364fe796351bc1971e106005 |
| 18 | CVE-2017-9761 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.6.0 | high | GH/commit/00e8f205475332d7842d0f0d1481eeab4e83017c |
| 19 | CVE-2017-9762 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 1.6.0 (est.) | estimate | GH/issues/7726 |
| 20 | CVE-2017-9763 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 1.6.0 | high | GH/commit/65000a7fd9eea62359e6d6714f17b94a99a82edd |
| 21 | CVE-2017-9949 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 1.6.0 | high | GH/commit/796dd28aaa6b9fa76d99c42c4d5ff8b257cc2191 |
| 22 | CVE-2018-10186 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | medium | GH/issues/9915 |
| 23 | CVE-2018-10187 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | medium | GH/issues/9913 |
| 24 | CVE-2018-11375 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/041e53cab7ca33481ae45ecd65ad596976d78e68 |
| 25 | CVE-2018-11376 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/1f37c04f2a762500222dda2459e6a04646feeedf |
| 26 | CVE-2018-11377 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/25a3703ef2e015bbe1d1f16f6b2f63bb10dd34f4 |
| 27 | CVE-2018-11379 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/4e1cf0d3e6f6fe2552a269def0af1cd2403e266c |
| 28 | CVE-2018-11380 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/60208765887f5f008b3b9a883f3addc8bdb9c134 |
| 29 | CVE-2018-11381 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/3fcf41ed96ffa25b38029449520c8d0a198745f3 |
| 30 | CVE-2018-11382 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/d04c78773f6959bcb427453f8e5b9824d5ba9eff |
| 31 | CVE-2018-11383 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/9d348bcc2c4bbd3805e7eec97b594be9febbdf9a |
| 32 | CVE-2018-11384 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.0 | high | GH/commit/77c47cf873dd55b396da60baa2ca83bbd39e4add |
| 33 | CVE-2018-12320 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 2.6.9 | high | GH/commit/90b71c017a7fa9732fe45fd21b245ee051b1f548 |
| 34 | CVE-2018-12321 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 2.6.9 | high | GH/commit/224e6bc13fa353dd3b7f7a2334588f1c4229e58d |
| 35 | CVE-2018-12322 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.9 | high | GH/commit/bbb4af56003c1afdad67af0c4339267ca38b1017 |
| 36 | CVE-2018-14015 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.9 | high | GH/commit/d37d2b858ac47f2f108034be0bcecadaddfbc8b3 |
| 37 | CVE-2018-14016 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.7.0 | high | GH/commit/eb7deb281df54771fb8ecf5890dc325a7d22d3e2 |
| 38 | CVE-2018-14017 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.6.9 | high | GH/commit/e9ce0d64faf19fa4e9c260250fbdf25e3c11e152 |
| 39 | CVE-2018-15834 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.9.0 | medium | GH/issues/11274 |
| 40 | CVE-2018-19842 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.0 | high | GH/commit/66191f780863ea8c66ace4040d0d04a8842e8432 |
| 41 | CVE-2018-19843 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.0 | high | GH/commit/f17bfd9f1da05f30f23a4dd05e9d2363e1406948 |
| 42 | CVE-2018-20455 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.1 | high | GH/commit/9b46d38dd3c4de6048a488b655c7319f845af185 |
| 43 | CVE-2018-20456 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.1 | high | GH/commit/9b46d38dd3c4de6048a488b655c7319f845af185 |
| 44 | CVE-2018-20457 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.2.0 | high | GH/commit/e5c14c167b0dcf0a53d76bd50bacbbcc0dfc1ae7 |
| 45 | CVE-2018-20458 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.1 | high | GH/commit/30f4c7b52a4e2dc0d0b1bae487d90f5437c69d19 |
| 46 | CVE-2018-20459 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.2.0 | high | GH/commit/e5c14c167b0dcf0a53d76bd50bacbbcc0dfc1ae7 |
| 47 | CVE-2018-20460 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.2 | high | GH/commit/df167c7db545953bb7f71c72e98e7a3ca0c793bf |
| 48 | CVE-2018-20461 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.1.1 | high | GH/commit/a1bc65c3db593530775823d6d7506a457ed95267 |
| 49 | CVE-2018-8808 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.5.0 | medium | GH/issues/9725 |
| 50 | CVE-2018-8809 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.5.0 | medium | GH/issues/9726 |
| 51 | CVE-2018-8810 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 2.5.0 | medium | GH/issues/9727 |
| 52 | CVE-2019-12790 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 3.6.0 | medium | GH/issues/14211 |
| 53 | CVE-2019-12802 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 3.6.0 | medium | GH/issues/14296 |
| 54 | CVE-2019-12829 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 3.6.0 | medium | GH/issues/14303 |
| 55 | CVE-2019-12865 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 3.6.0 | medium | GH/issues/14334 |
| 56 | CVE-2019-14745 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 3.7.0 | medium | GH/issues/14690 |
| 57 | CVE-2019-16718 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 3.9.0 | high | GH/commit/5411543a310a470b1257fb93273cdd6e8dfcb3af |
| 58 | CVE-2019-19590 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 4.1.0 | medium | GH/issues/15543 |
| 59 | CVE-2019-19647 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 4.1.0 | medium | GH/issues/15545 |
| 60 | CVE-2020-15121 | GitHub_M | 7.4/HIGH | ❌ | 4.5.0 | high | GH/commit/04edfa82c1f3fa2bc3621ccdad2f93bdbf00e4f9 |
| 61 | CVE-2020-16269 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 4.5.1 (est.) | estimate | GH/issues/17383 |
| 62 | CVE-2020-17487 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 4.5.1 (est.) | estimate | GH/issues/17431 |
| 63 | CVE-2020-24133 | mitre | 9.8/CRITICAL | ❌ | 6.1.2 | medium | GH/issues/255 |
| 64 | CVE-2020-27793 | redhat | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 4.4.0 | high | GH/commit/ced0223c7a1b3b5344af315715cd28fe7c0d9ebc |
| 65 | CVE-2020-27794 | redhat | 9.1/CRITICAL | ❌ | 4.4.0 | high | GH/commit/cb8b683758edddae2d2f62e8e63a738c39f92683 |
| 66 | CVE-2020-27795 | redhat | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 4.4.0 | high | GH/commit/4d3811681a80f92a53e795f6a64c4b0fc2c8dd22 |
| 67 | CVE-2021-32494 | fedora | 10.0/CRITICAL | ❌ | 5.3.0 | high | GH/commit/a07dedb804a82bc01c07072861942dd80c6b6d62 |
| 68 | CVE-2021-32495 | fedora | 10.0/CRITICAL | ❌ | 5.3.0 | high | GH/commit/5e16e2d1c9fe245e4c17005d779fde91ec0b9c05 |
| 69 | CVE-2021-32613 | fedora | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.3.0 | high | GH/commit/5e16e2d1c9fe245e4c17005d779fde91ec0b9c05 |
| 70 | CVE-2021-3673 | fedora | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.4.0 | high (runtime-verified) | GH/commit/d7ea20fb2e (issue #18923) |
| 71 | CVE-2021-4021 | fedora | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.2 | medium | GH/issues/19436 |
| 72 | CVE-2021-44974 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.5.4 | medium | GH/issues/19478 |
| 73 | CVE-2021-44975 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.5.4 | medium | GH/issues/19476 |
| 74 | CVE-2022-0173 | @huntrdev | 5.5/MEDIUM | ✅ | Will be fixed in the upcoming r2-5.6.0 | in-record | GH/commit/37897226a1a31f982bfefdc4aeefc2e50355c73c |
| 75 | CVE-2022-0520 | @huntrdev | 7.8/HIGH | ✅ | 5.6.2 | in-record | GH/commit/8525ad0b9fd596f4b251bb3d7b114e6dc7ce1ee8 |
| 76 | CVE-2022-0522 | @huntrdev | 7.1/HIGH | ✅ | 5.6.2 | in-record | GH/commit/d17a7bdf166108a29a27cd89bf454f9fa6c050d6 |
| 77 | CVE-2022-1382 | @huntrdev | 5.5/MEDIUM | ✅ | 5.6.8 | in-record | GH/commit/48f0ea79f99174fb0a62cb2354e13496ce5b7c44 |
| 78 | CVE-2022-28068 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.0 | high | GH/commit/637f4bd1af6752e28e0a9998e954e2e9ce6fa992 |
| 79 | CVE-2022-28069 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.0 | high | GH/commit/49b0cebfdf0db9704e36f8a5533f1df6d3e2ed3a |
| 80 | CVE-2022-28070 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.0 | high | GH/commit/4aff1bb00224de4f5bc118f987dfd5d2fe3450d0 |
| 81 | CVE-2022-28071 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.0 | high | GH/commit/65448811e5b9582a19cf631e03cfcaa025a92ef5 |
| 82 | CVE-2022-28072 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.0 | high | GH/commit/027cd9b7274988bb1af866539ba6c2fa2ff63e45 |
| 83 | CVE-2022-28073 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.5.0 | high | GH/commit/59a9dfb60acf8b5c0312061cffd9693fc9526053 |
| 84 | CVE-2022-34502 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.7.2 | medium | GH/issues/20336 |
| 85 | CVE-2022-34520 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.7.4 | medium | GH/issues/20354 |
| 86 | CVE-2023-27114 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.8.4 | high | GH/commit/a15067a8eaa836bcc24b0882712c14d1baa66509 |
| 87 | CVE-2023-46569 | mitre | 9.8/CRITICAL | ❌ | 5.9.0 | medium | GH/issues/22334 |
| 88 | CVE-2023-46570 | mitre | 9.8/CRITICAL | ❌ | 5.9.0 | medium | GH/issues/22333 |
| 89 | CVE-2023-47016 | mitre | 7.5/HIGH | ❌ | 5.9.0 | high | GH/commit/40c9f50e127be80b9d816bce2ab2ee790831aefd |
| 90 | CVE-2024-11858 | fedora | 8.6/HIGH | ✅ | 5.9.9 | in-record | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2329102 |
| 91 | CVE-2024-26475 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.8.8 | in-description | https://github.com/TronciuVlad/CVE-2024-26475 |
| 92 | CVE-2024-29645 | mitre | 7.8/HIGH | ❌ | 5.9.0 | high | GH/commit/72bf3a486fa851797aa21887a40ba0e3d3a6d620 |
| 93 | CVE-2024-29646 | mitre | 9.8/CRITICAL | ❌ | 5.9.0 | high | GH/commit/098669591ca0327619fd2df572ca81d2dfe50ec0 |
| 94 | CVE-2024-48241 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 5.9.6 | high | GH/commit/b2a467cd13c561042554901313ebdcb749eb0de7 |
| 95 | CVE-2025-1378 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/c6c772d2eab692ce7ada5a4227afd50c355ad545 |
| 96 | CVE-2025-1744 | GovTech CSG | 9.8/CRITICAL | ✅ | <5.9.9 | in-record | GH/pull/23969 |
| 97 | CVE-2025-1864 | GovTech CSG | 9.8/CRITICAL | ✅ | <5.9.9 | in-record | GH/pull/23981 |
| 98 | CVE-2025-5641 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 99 | CVE-2025-5642 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 100 | CVE-2025-5643 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 101 | CVE-2025-5644 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 102 | CVE-2025-5645 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 103 | CVE-2025-5646 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 104 | CVE-2025-5647 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 105 | CVE-2025-5648 | VulDB | 2.5/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/5705d99cc1f23f36f9a84aab26d1724010b97798 |
| 106 | CVE-2025-60358 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/a1ca1086cbea556fe15a2a14626a22462a475d57 |
| 107 | CVE-2025-60359 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/a35c2895e0f820f5cbfa5e78ec1d4bfd981c7c6f |
| 108 | CVE-2025-60360 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/446671dafa81aa377305369796f03f31ed674bd9 |
| 109 | CVE-2025-60361 | mitre | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.0.0 | high | GH/commit/090dec1fe3204b2d1da6a6cfba286009e0dca128 |
| 110 | CVE-2025-63744 | mitre | 4.3/MEDIUM | ❌ | 6.0.6 | high | GH/commit/e37e15d10fd8a19c3e57b3d7735a2cfe0082ec79 |
| 111 | CVE-2025-63745 | mitre | 5.5/MEDIUM | ❌ | 6.0.6 | high | GH/commit/6c5df3f8570d4f0c360681c08241ad8af3b919fd |
| 112 | CVE-2026-14757 | VulDB | 5.3/MEDIUM | ❌ | 6.1.8 (est.) | estimate | GH/issues/26041 |
| 113 | CVE-2026-14758 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/84e773986e7e5bb30453a9384f498ec0ccc9d0a9 |
| 114 | CVE-2026-14759 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/cd62d15a6cbecdc67fd03f3ebdbbbeb741d18f87 |
| 115 | CVE-2026-14760 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/8b25c773785d85cb0103410a0905089d286921c2 |
| 116 | CVE-2026-14761 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/a20a56917ae85d732e683f8d9078bdcfee92446c |
| 117 | CVE-2026-14786 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/11ac224c0eb8d57830fccc99e1c1cd8e5d958813 |
| 118 | CVE-2026-14787 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/2b6265476c75567006b0fcbb749f4ae7b189c5df |
| 119 | CVE-2026-14788 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/635ab1eeb30340c26076722a90cb91fb2272130b |
| 120 | CVE-2026-14789 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ❌ | 6.1.8 | high | GH/commit/175d4addb68981331c85b10681c2161c38fb5762 |
| 121 | CVE-2026-40499 | VulnCheck | 7.8/HIGH | ✅ | 6.1.4 | in-record | GH/commit/5590c87deeb7eb2a106fd7aab9ca88bfeebb7397 |
| 122 | CVE-2026-40517 | VulnCheck | 7.8/HIGH | ✅ | 6.1.4 | in-record | GH/pull/25731 |
| 123 | CVE-2026-40527 | VulnCheck | 7.8/HIGH | ✅ | bc5a89033db3ecb5b1f7bf681fc6ba4dcfc14683 | in-record | GH/commit/bc5a89033db3ecb5b1f7bf681fc6ba4dcfc14683 |
| 124 | CVE-2026-41015 | mitre | 7.4/HIGH | ✅ | 9236f44a28812fe911814e1b3a7bcf1e4de5d3c2 | in-record | GH/commit/9236f44a28812fe911814e1b3a7bcf1e4de5d3c2 |
| 125 | CVE-2026-4174 | VulDB | 3.3/LOW | ✅ | 6.1.2 | in-record | https://github.com/ToddAWalter/radare2/commit/4371ae84c99c46b48cb21badbbef06b30757aba0 |
| 126 | CVE-2026-6940 | VulnCheck | 7.1/HIGH | ✅ | e5fcf56fe038760c872c6dbed432602778fde1ed git | in-record | GH/pull/25830 |
| 127 | CVE-2026-6941 | VulnCheck | 6.6/MEDIUM | ✅ | 6.1.4 | in-record | GH/commit/4bcdee725ff0754ed721a98789c0af371c5f32a4 |
| 128 | CVE-2026-6942 | VulnCheck | 9.8/CRITICAL | ✅ | 1.6.0 | in-record | GH-mcp/commit/482cde6500009112a8bc0b3fa8d2ef6180581ec0 |
| 129 | CVE-2026-8695 | VulnCheck | 7.5/HIGH | ✅ | c213ad6894a1eb9086ac8bf5fae35757e9e1683c | in-record | GH/commit/c213ad6894a1eb9086ac8bf5fae35757e9e1683c |
| 130 | CVE-2026-8696 | VulnCheck | 7.5/HIGH | ✅ | c213ad6894a1eb9086ac8bf5fae35757e9e1683c | in-record | GH/commit/c213ad6894a1eb9086ac8bf5fae35757e9e1683c |
Everything above is derived from two authoritative, publicly queryable sources (not from the aggregator page, which is Cloudflare-blocked):
1. NVD API v2 — the 130-record universe and NVD’s layer-2 enrichment:
curl -s "https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?keywordSearch=radare2&resultsPerPage=2000" -o nvd_radare2.json
# totalResults = 1302. MITRE / CVE.org CVE Services v5 — the layer-1 CNA records (owner + structured fix data):
# For each CVE ID:
curl -s "https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2019-19590"
# cveMetadata.assignerShortName -> owning CNA
# containers.cna.affected[].versions[] -> lessThan / status:unaffected = fix boundaryReproduction of the headline number: count records
where any affected[].versions[] entry has
lessThan, lessThanOrEqual, or
status:"unaffected". - With a fix boundary: 17 /
130 (13.1%) - Without (→ “not fixed”): 113 / 130
(86.9%) ← matches valtersit’s ~87%.
Key finding restated: the 87% is a record-completeness metric, not a patch-status metric. NVD’s own layer-2 data already carries a Patch reference or fixed-version bound for 117/130 (90%) of these — the bugs are fixed; the CNA-level structured field just isn’t populated.
Caveats: the denominator (130) is NVD’s
keywordSearch=radare2; a different tool’s denominator may
vary by a couple of records. Detection of “fix boundary” is conservative
— it counts only the machine-readable versions[] field, so
records that name a fixed version only in prose (e.g. Red Hat’s
CVE-2020-27793/4/5 → “Fixed in v4.4.0”) are correctly shown
as ❌ no here, because that is exactly how an aggregator
sees them.